Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40340247›Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2025

Concept CARs are picking up speed.

Jorge Mansilla-Soto, Michael C Milone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jorge Mansilla-SotoDepartments of Immunology, Bioengineering, and BMT and Cellular Immunotherapy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Michael C MiloneDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: milone@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of adoptive T cell immunotherapy has been dominated by a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) design that combines antigen recognition through antibody-derived domains and signaling into a single polypeptide. This conventional design redirects the immense cytotoxic potential of T cells toward tumors, and it is the core of several commercially marketed CAR-T cell products. Recent research in the field has been focused on developing more effective CAR designs, especially for solid tumors. Although most approaches have layered on top of the conventional CAR design, recent studies have taken a step back and redesigned the basic CAR to retain more of the natural structure of immunoreceptors such as the T cell receptor or killer immunoglobulin-like receptors. These redesigned CARs promote enhanced function in preclinical models compared with conventional CAR designs, including in the more challenging solid tumor setting, and several have entered the clinic with emerging data on their activity. These observations highlight the importance of considering CAR design and looking beyond conventional CARs when developing new T cell immunotherapy approaches.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAnimalsHumansReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID40340247
PMCPMC12172278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.