ReviewClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2025
SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Transplanting Hope: Managing Relapsed/Refractory AML.
Review in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune monitoring for relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in clinical laboratories.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous malignant disorder of myeloid precursor cells, with high relapse rates, particularly in patients who fail to achieve morphological remission after induction therapy. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) can induce durable remissions through the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect, yet current approaches of allo-HSCT often fail, with relapse rates of ∼40% within 6 months post-transplant. Outcomes following allo-HCT are inversely proportional to leukemia burden at the time of transplant. Both morphological relapse (≥5% blasts in the marrow) or minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity predict significantly reduced overall survival rates. Emerging strategies to improve outcomes in patients with high leukemic burden include aggressive bridging therapies (encompassing intensive salvage chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents, targeted inhibitors, and sequential induction-conditioning approaches such as FLAMSA), tailored conditioning regimens, post-transplant maintenance therapy, and innovative graft engineering methods. Graft engineering strategies, such as ORCA-T, which engineers stem cell grafts with a defined ratio of T-regulatory cells to effector T cells, are particularly promising and under evaluation in phase III clinical trials. These approaches aim to improve upon the poor outcomes for patients with persistent/relapsed AML undergoing allo-HCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.