ArticleThe Journal of hospital infection2025
Comparative analysis of machine learning models for predicting hospital- and community-associated urinary tract infections using demographic, hospital, and socioeconomic predictors.
Article in The Journal of hospital infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of a machine learning model for predicting urine culture positivity in children with suspected urinary tract infections.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Bayesian inference of nosocomial meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission rates in an urban safety-net hospital.The Journal of hospital infection · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDifferentiating between community-associated (CA-) and healthcare-associated (HA-) urinary tract infection (UTI) is crucial for understanding their epidemiology, identifying risk factors, and developing appropriate treatment strategies.
aimTo build, validate, and compare machine learning models: Decision Tree, Neural Network, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting to differentiate between the incidences of HA-UTI and CA-UTI; additionally, to identify key predictors of UTI using demographic, hospital, and socioeconomic variables.
methodsPatient demographics, hospital, and socioeconomic data from 2019 to 2023 were analysed.
findingsThe Decision Tree model demonstrated the highest sensitivity, particularly in handling the highly imbalanced data of HAI, with a sensitivity of 87%. Logistic Regression achieved the best overall accuracy, at 95.9% for distinguishing HA-UTI from UTI-free and 93.2% for HA-UTI vs CA-UTI. Random Forest performed best in cross-validation, reaching 99.1% for HA-UTI vs UTI free and 96.2% for HA-UTI vs CA-UTI. Neural Network showed the highest specificity, at 93.4%, for HA-UTI vs CA-UTI. The area-under-the-curve values further supported these findings, ranging from 71.9% for Neural Network to 94% for Random Forest, reflecting the robustness of these models across different annual datasets. Among patient demographics, hospital, and socioeconomic variables, all models consistently identified the Nurse Units (e.g. Inpatient Units and Mental Health Units) as the most significant predictors of UTI. In addition to Nurse Units, Logistic Regression and Decision Tree identified location (e.g. various clinics and medical centres) as a key predictor.
conclusionThe machine learning models demonstrated comparable overall accuracy, but differed in sensitivity and specificity across the two classification tasks-HA-UTI vs CA-UTI and HA-UTI vs UTI-free. Nurse Units consistently emerge as the most significant predictors across all years. The importance of all predictors varies from year to year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.