Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40339918›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of hospital infection2025

Comparative analysis of machine learning models for predicting hospital- and community-associated urinary tract infections using demographic, hospital, and socioeconomic predictors.

A Arjmand, M Bani-Yaghoub, G Sutkin, K Corkran, S Paschal

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of hospital infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A ArjmandDivision of Computing, Analytics and Mathematics, School of Science and Engineering, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
M Bani-YaghoubDivision of Computing, Analytics and Mathematics, School of Science and Engineering, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Kansas, USA. Electronic address: baniyaghoubm@umkc.edu.
G SutkinDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, KS, USA.
K CorkranDivision of Computing, Analytics and Mathematics, School of Science and Engineering, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
S PaschalUniversity Health, Kansas City Hospital, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Funding

ACL HHS U01CK000671NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferentiating between community-associated (CA-) and healthcare-associated (HA-) urinary tract infection (UTI) is crucial for understanding their epidemiology, identifying risk factors, and developing appropriate treatment strategies.

aimTo build, validate, and compare machine learning models: Decision Tree, Neural Network, Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting to differentiate between the incidences of HA-UTI and CA-UTI; additionally, to identify key predictors of UTI using demographic, hospital, and socioeconomic variables.

methodsPatient demographics, hospital, and socioeconomic data from 2019 to 2023 were analysed.

findingsThe Decision Tree model demonstrated the highest sensitivity, particularly in handling the highly imbalanced data of HAI, with a sensitivity of 87%. Logistic Regression achieved the best overall accuracy, at 95.9% for distinguishing HA-UTI from UTI-free and 93.2% for HA-UTI vs CA-UTI. Random Forest performed best in cross-validation, reaching 99.1% for HA-UTI vs UTI free and 96.2% for HA-UTI vs CA-UTI. Neural Network showed the highest specificity, at 93.4%, for HA-UTI vs CA-UTI. The area-under-the-curve values further supported these findings, ranging from 71.9% for Neural Network to 94% for Random Forest, reflecting the robustness of these models across different annual datasets. Among patient demographics, hospital, and socioeconomic variables, all models consistently identified the Nurse Units (e.g. Inpatient Units and Mental Health Units) as the most significant predictors of UTI. In addition to Nurse Units, Logistic Regression and Decision Tree identified location (e.g. various clinics and medical centres) as a key predictor.

conclusionThe machine learning models demonstrated comparable overall accuracy, but differed in sensitivity and specificity across the two classification tasks-HA-UTI vs CA-UTI and HA-UTI vs UTI-free. Nurse Units consistently emerge as the most significant predictors across all years. The importance of all predictors varies from year to year.

Indexed as

Community-Acquired InfectionsCross InfectionMachine LearningUrinary Tract InfectionsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDecision TreesFemaleHospitalsHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsCommunity-associated infectionHealthcare-associated infectionMachine learningSocioeconomic factorsUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID40339918
PMCPMC12875383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.