Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40339543›Full record

ArticleAccident; analysis and prevention2025

Artificial intelligence automated solution for hazard annotation and eye tracking in a simulated environment.

Piyush Pawar, Benjamin McManus, Thomas Anthony, Jingzhen Yang, Thomas Kerwin, Despina Stavrinos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accident; analysis and prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Piyush PawarInstitute for Social Science Research, University of Alabama, 306 Paul W. Bryant Drive East, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, USA. Electronic address: ppawar@ua.edu.
Benjamin McManusInstitute for Social Science Research, University of Alabama, 306 Paul W. Bryant Drive East, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, USA. Electronic address: bjmcmanus@ua.edu.
Thomas AnthonyAnalytical AI, 1500, 1st Ave. N, Birmingham, AL 35022, USA. Electronic address: thomas@analyticalai.com.
Jingzhen YangDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Center for Injury Research and Policy, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Dr. RBIII-WB5403 Columbus, OH 43205, USA. Electronic address: ginger.yang@nationwidechildrens.org.
Thomas KerwinOhio State University, Driving Simulation Laboratory, The Ohio State University, 1305 Kinnear Road, Suite 194, Columbus OH 43212, USA. Electronic address: kerwin.6@osu.edu.
Despina StavrinosInstitute for Social Science Research, University of Alabama, 306 Paul W. Bryant Drive East, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, USA. Electronic address: dstavrinos@ua.edu.

Funding

Longitudinal Assessment of Driving After Mild TBI in TeensR01HD098175 · NICHD · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI STAVRINOS, DESPINA, YANG, JINGZHEN GINGER · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD098175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-fidelity simulators and sensors are commonly used in research to create immersive environments for studying real-world problems. This setup records detailed data, generating large datasets. In driving research, a full-scale car model repurposed as a driving simulator allows human subjects to navigate realistic driving scenarios. Data from these experiments are collected in raw form, requiring extensive manual annotation of roadway elements such as hazards and distractions. This process is often time-consuming, labor-intensive, and repetitive, causing delays in research progress. This paper proposes an AI-driven solution to automate these tasks, enabling researchers to focus on analysis and advance their studies efficiently. The solution builds on previous driving behavior research using a high-fidelity full-cab simulator equipped with gaze-tracking cameras. It extends the capabilities of the earlier system described in Pawar's (2021) "Hazard Detection in Driving Simulation using Deep Learning", which performed only hazard detection. The enhanced system now integrates both hazard annotation and gaze-tracking data. By combining vehicle handling parameters with drivers' visual attention data, the proposed method provides a unified, detailed view of participants' driving behavior across various simulated scenarios. This approach streamlines data analysis, accelerates research timelines, and enhances understanding of driving behavior.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficArtificial IntelligenceAutomobile DrivingComputer SimulationEye-Tracking TechnologyAdultAttentionDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleDeep LearningDriving Hazard detectionDriving SimulationGaze TrackingObject DetectionTranslational Research

Identifiers

PMID40339543
PMCPMC12123859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.