ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Qualitative analysis of patient and key informant interviews to inform integration of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis services into gynecology care in Alabama.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- PrEP4Her: Evaluating the Reach, Adoption, Preliminary Effectiveness and Fidelity of a Multi-Component Hybrid Type 3 Trial Designed to Increase PrEP Prescriptions for Black Women Receiving Gynaecologic Care in a University-Affiliated Women's Health Setting in the United States South.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
- Start the Conversation: Development of a Training Program to Build OB/GYN Resident Capacity for PrEP Prescribing in Routine Care.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareArticle
- Who cares for Black women in health and health care: Reimagining the strong Black woman trope to advance Black women's health equity.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is low among Southern, Black cis-gender women (CGW). Gynecology clinics are well-positioned to integrate PrEP services as a component of sexual and reproductive healthcare for CGW.
objectivesIdentify key determinants to PrEP implementation into routine gynecologic care.
designQualitative, in-depth interviews (IDIs).
methodsWe conducted IDIs with key informants (i.e., physicians, nurses, medical assistants) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with patients accessing care in a gynecology clinic serving under- and uninsured women in Alabama. IDIs explored individual-, setting-, and process-level factors that may impact PrEP care implementation in a clinic serving approximately 3000 women yearly, 64% of whom are Black women.
resultsTen key informants participated in individual IDIs (median age 33.5, range 24-58 years, 80% female); 20 women participated in either 1 of 4 FGDs (
conclusionDiscussions around sexual health and STIs are limited in routine gynecologic care, but patients expect comprehensive counseling from knowledgeable providers. Additional provider training may increase comfort discussing and providing PrEP. These findings will inform development of implementation strategies to integrate PrEP care into gynecologic services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.