ArticleJournal of medical entomology2025
Delayed mating in the malaria vector Anopheles funestus compared to Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae).
Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mating is a vital behavior for mosquito reproduction, yet it remains poorly understood under captive conditions. We examined the copulation dynamics of 2 key malaria vectors, Anopheles funestus sensu stricto Giles and Anopheles arabiensis Patton, under laboratory settings in Tanzania. We conducted observations in 24-h cycles and monitored copulation events and insemination of females, initially using flashlights for nighttime visibility, followed by red lights in subsequent experiments. We observed how variations in mosquito age and artificial lighting influenced mating success for these 2 mosquito species within cages under controlled conditions. We found that An. arabiensis copulated relatively soon after emergence, with 32.4% of individuals mating by day 3 postemergence, whereas An. funestus showed delayed activity, reaching a similar mating frequency by day 8. The introduction of artificial red light significantly accelerated copulation in An. funestus but did not affect An. arabiensis. Sperm transfer and mating plug delivery in over 92% of copulating pairs of both species was confirmed by dissection. Mating occurred primarily at night, with distinct peaks at 10 PM for An. arabiensis and 11 PM for An. funestus. In conclusion, our findings revealed species-specific differences in reproductive behavior, which could improve the colonization of An. funestus, a species historically challenging to rear in captivity. These insights also may facilitate the development of new vector control technologies, such as sterile insect techniques and genetic-based approaches, that exploit mosquito mating behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.