Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40339136›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical entomology2025

Delayed mating in the malaria vector Anopheles funestus compared to Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae).

Emmanuel Elirehema Hape, Alex Thadei Ngonyani, Daniel Mathias Mabula, Joel Daniel Nkya, Claus Augustino Thomas, Mohamed Jumanne Omari, Doreen Josen Siria, Halfan Said Ngowo, Lizette Leonie Koekemoer, Fredros Oketch Okumu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emmanuel Elirehema HapeEnvironmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-0104-8335
Alex Thadei NgonyaniEnvironmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Daniel Mathias MabulaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Joel Daniel NkyaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Claus Augustino ThomasDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, St. Francis University College of Health and Allied Sciences (SFUCHAS), Ifakara, Tanzania.
Mohamed Jumanne OmariEnvironmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Doreen Josen SiriaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Halfan Said NgowoEnvironmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.
Lizette Leonie KoekemoerWits Research Institute for Malaria, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4236-6345
Fredros Oketch OkumuEnvironmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Ifakara, Tanzania.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-002138 & INV-003079Gates Foundation INV-002138Gates Foundation INV-003079National Research Foundation of South Africa SRUG2203311457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mating is a vital behavior for mosquito reproduction, yet it remains poorly understood under captive conditions. We examined the copulation dynamics of 2 key malaria vectors, Anopheles funestus sensu stricto Giles and Anopheles arabiensis Patton, under laboratory settings in Tanzania. We conducted observations in 24-h cycles and monitored copulation events and insemination of females, initially using flashlights for nighttime visibility, followed by red lights in subsequent experiments. We observed how variations in mosquito age and artificial lighting influenced mating success for these 2 mosquito species within cages under controlled conditions. We found that An. arabiensis copulated relatively soon after emergence, with 32.4% of individuals mating by day 3 postemergence, whereas An. funestus showed delayed activity, reaching a similar mating frequency by day 8. The introduction of artificial red light significantly accelerated copulation in An. funestus but did not affect An. arabiensis. Sperm transfer and mating plug delivery in over 92% of copulating pairs of both species was confirmed by dissection. Mating occurred primarily at night, with distinct peaks at 10 PM for An. arabiensis and 11 PM for An. funestus. In conclusion, our findings revealed species-specific differences in reproductive behavior, which could improve the colonization of An. funestus, a species historically challenging to rear in captivity. These insights also may facilitate the development of new vector control technologies, such as sterile insect techniques and genetic-based approaches, that exploit mosquito mating behavior.

Indexed as

AnophelesMosquito VectorsSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsCopulationFemaleMalariaMaleSpecies SpecificityTanzaniainseminationlight wavelengthmalaria vectorsreproductive behavior

Identifiers

PMID40339136
PMCPMC12271730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.