Trial reportPloS one2025
Effects of dual-task training on cognitive-motor learning and cortical activation: A non-randomized clinical trial in healthy young adults.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive, functional and affective effects of a multi-task training in nursing home residents: results from a randomized pilot study.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026Trial
- Differential Effects of Cognitive vs. Motor Dual-Task Training in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Precision-Focused Meta-Analysis.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cognitive-exercise dual-task training delays natural aging/D-galactose-induced cognitive decline in mice.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2026Article
- Associations between incremental exercise capacity and multimodal brain characteristics across training levels.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Simulated Hearing Loss in Healthy Young Adults Does Not Change Reactive Balance Responses.Journal of motor control and learning · 2025Article
- Comparative effects of single-task and dual-task acute moderate-intensity exercise on cortisol and cognitive performance.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dual-task (DT) training, which involves the simultaneous execution of cognitive and motor tasks, has been shown to influence task performance and cortical activation, yet evidence on the effects of DT training and cortical activation for complex postural control tasks remains limited. This study investigated the immediate and retention effects of a one-week DT training program on DT learning, performance in DT and single-task conditions, and activation in bilateral prefrontal (PFC) and vestibular cortices in healthy young adults. Eighteen individuals (age = 22.39 ± 1.73 years) participated in the study. The DT paradigm involved a dynamic stability platform (motor task) paired with either a simple or complex auditory reaction time (RT) task (cognitive). Participants completed 20-25 minutes of DT training (18 trials/day) across five consecutive days. DT performance was measured by the duration participants maintained the stability platform within 3 degrees of the horizontal while responding to auditory stimuli. Single-task motor and cognitive performances were also assessed. Cortical activation in the PFC and vestibular cortices was measured using functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), tracking changes in oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO) concentrations. Pre-training, post-training, and one-week follow-up testing was conducted. The results demonstrate that DT training significantly improves and retains DT performance, likely due to a reduction in cognitive-motor interference. Additionally, DT training led to decreased activation in the bilateral PFC and vestibular cortices, specifically for complex DT condition, suggesting enhanced attentional resource allocation and optimized vestibular input processing, indicative of neural efficiency. Notably, these training effects also transferred to single-task cognitive and motor performances, with corresponding reductions in PFC and vestibular cortex activation, despite the lack of direct training on these tasks. This study advances our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying DT training and underscores the critical role of practice in optimizing cognitive-motor efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.