ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Unprecedented in vivo activity of telacebec against Mycobacterium leprae.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Tuberculosis Treatment with Next-Generation Drugs and Smart Delivery Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- New drugs for the management of tuberculosis.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNew drugs targeting the electron transport chain (ETC) seem to be a promising advance in leprosy treatment. In this study, we evaluated the bactericidal activity of telacebec (TCB), a phase 2 drug candidate for tuberculosis, alongside known ETC-targeting antibiotics, bedaquiline (BDQ) and clofazimine (CFZ), as monotherapy or in combination. METHODOLOGY/ PRINCIPAL
findingsWe used the reference leprosy proportional bactericidal mouse footpad model. Four hundred and ten mice were inoculated in the footpads with 5x104 to 5x100 bacilli of M. leprae strain THAI53 for the untreated control group and groups treated with drug-monotherapies, and with 5x104 to 5x101 for groups treated with drug-combinations. Mice were randomly allocated into the following groups: 2 control groups (untreated or standard multi drug therapy (MDT), rifampin, dapsone and clofazimine with dosing equipotent to human dosing) and 7 test groups (TCB 10mg/kg, bedaquiline 25mg/kg (BDQ), clofazimine 20mg/kg (CFZ), CFZ + BDQ, TCB + BDQ, TCB + CFZ, TCB + CFZ + BDQ). Mice in the test groups received either one month treatment (MDT) or a single dose of the drugs (TCB, RIF, BDQ, CFZ). Twelve months later, mice were sacrificed to enumerate M. leprae bacilli in the footpad. All the footpads became negative in the MDT, TCB and combination groups except in the TCB + CFZ group where 2 mice remained positive in the 5x104 inoculum.
conclusionWe demonstrated that monotherapy of TCB exhibited bactericidal activity against M. leprae comparable to that of MDT and that all combination therapies were as effective as MDT, except the combination TCB + CFZ, possibly due to an antagonism between these two drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.