Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40338887›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Cost savings of outpatient versus inpatient hip and knee arthroplasty in Ontario, Canada.

Steven Habbous, Sisira Sarma, Brent Lanting, James Waddell, Erik Hellsten

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Steven HabbousOntario Health (Strategic Analytics), 525 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9650-9105
Sisira SarmaDepartment of Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9174-765X
Brent LantingDepartment of Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
James WaddellDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Erik HellstenOntario Health (Strategic Analytics), 525 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHip and knee replacement surgery is one of the most commonly performed elective procedures, accounting for significant healthcare costs and resource utilization. In recent years, the proportion of hip and knee arthroplasties performed in outpatient settings has grown rapidly. Although the safety and effectiveness of outpatient vs. inpatient hip and knee arthroplasty have been documented in the literature, estimates of health system cost-savings in Canada are limited.

methodsWe employed a population-based retrospective cohort study design. We obtained data on patients aged 18-105 years who underwent hip or knee replacement surgery in both inpatient and outpatient settings in Ontario, Canada between 2018/19 and 2022/23. Patients who underwent outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty were matched to inpatient cases using a propensity score based on age, sex, comorbidity, area-level sociodemographic factors, total/partial replacement, and surgery date. We analyzed cost data that included hospitalization and ambulatory care visits, physician billing, home care, and oral medications. We utilized generalized linear models to identify the best fit regression model and estimated the average cost-savings associated with outpatient versus inpatient arthroplasty during the preoperative (30-days before surgery), perioperative (surgery + 30 days), 1-6-month postoperative, 6-12-month postoperative, 12-24-month postoperative, and 24-36-month postoperative periods. The costs were reported in 2023 Canadian dollars.

resultsA total of 35,894 hip arthroplasty patients and 49,597 knee arthroplasty patients were included in our analysis. During the perioperative period, outpatient arthroplasty was less costly than inpatient arthroplasty for hip replacement by $3,859 (95% CI -$4045, -$3745) and for knee replacement by $3,966 ($-4080, $-3851). Over 3 years of follow-up, outpatient arthroplasty was less costly than inpatient arthroplasty for hip replacement by $7058 (-$8086, -$6031) and for knee replacement by $7043 (-$7842, -$6243).

conclusionOutpatient hip and knee arthroplasty is cost-saving both during and beyond the perioperative period in comparison with similar patients who undergo inpatient arthroplasty in Ontario. Policies should be put in place to incentivize continued uptake of outpatient arthroplasty, which we estimate could save the Ontario healthcare system up to $98 million per year.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCost SavingsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedOntarioOutpatients

Identifiers

PMID40338887
PMCPMC12061100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.