SynthesisPloS one2025
Help! - you need your hands: Contribution of arm movements on balance performance in healthy individuals: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of restricted compared to free arms motion during standing and walking at height in healthy adolescents.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Arm movement strategies did not influence emotional state and static postural control during height-induced postural threat in children and young adults.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Effects of age and arm movement condition on dynamic balance performance during virtual height exposure.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Influence of different arm movement strategies on dynamic balance performance and joint kinematics in healthy young adults.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmerging evidence highlights that arm movements exert a substantial and functionally relevant contribution on postural control in healthy individuals. However, performance differences between free versus restricted arm movement for different balance categories with varying levels of task difficulty have not been systematically investigated yet.
objectiveThe objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to characterise, aggregate, and quantify performance discrepancies between free and restricted arm movement conditions for diverging balance categories with varying levels of task difficulty in healthy individuals.
methodsA systematic search of the literature according to the PRISMA guidelines was performed on the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus from their inception date till 1st September 2024. To be applicable for analysis, studies had to report at least one measure of balance performance in healthy individuals. The included studies were coded according to the following criteria: age, sex, status, arm movement conditions, balance test, and test modality. Methodological study quality was assessed using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Weighted standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated and classified according to their magnitude.
resultsThe literature search identified a total of N = 941 records, 25 of which met the inclusion criteria and were analysed in this review. A total of 725 participants (n = 331 females) participated in the studies. The free use of arm movement resulted in moderate (static: SMD = 0.51, dynamic: SMD = 0.66, proactive: SMD = 0.52, reactive: SMD = 0.50) improvements of balance performance. In addition, the performance enhancements were more pronounced for balance tasks with a high (static: SMD = 0.89, dynamic: SMD = 1.04) compared to a low (static: SMD = 0.20, dynamic: SMD = 0.76) difficulty level. Due to a lack of studies, no analysis for measures of proactive and reactive balance was performed.
conclusionsThe findings revealed that the free use of arm movement positively affects several measures of balance performance, and this is effect is more pronounced for balance tasks with a high difficulty level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.