ArticlePloS one2025
Identifying primary-care features associated with complex mental health difficulties.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Complex mental health difficulties: a mixed-methods study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe coded prevalence of complex mental health difficulties in electronic health records, such as personality disorder and dysthymia,is much lower than expected from population surveys. We aimed to identify features in primary care records that might be useful in promoting greater recognition of complex mental health difficulties. METHODS AND
findingsWe analysed Connected Bradford, an anonymised primary care database of approximately 1.15M citizens. We used multiple approaches to generate a large set of features representing multi-level collections of patient attributes across time and dimensions of healthcare. Feature sets included antecedent and concurrent problems (psychiatric, social and medical), patterns of prescription and service use and temporal stability of attendance. These were tested individually and in combination. We analysed the relationship between features and diagnostic codes using scaled mutual information. We identified 3,040 records satisfying our definition of complex mental health difficulties. This was 0.3% of the population compared to an expected prevalence of 3-5%. We generated >500,000 features. The most informative feature was count of unique psychiatric diagnoses. Other features were identified, including binary features (e.g., presence or absence of prescription for antipsychotic medication), continuous features (e.g., entropy of non-attendance) and counts of features (e.g., concerning behaviours such as self-harm & substance misuse). Several of these showed odds ratios >=5 or <=0.2 but low positive predictive value. We suggest this is due to the large number of "cases" being uncoded and, thus appearing as "controls".
conclusionComplex mental health difficulties are poorly coded. We demonstrated the feasibility of using information theoretic approaches to develop a large set of novel features in electronic health records. While these are currently insufficient for diagnosis, several can act as prompts to consider further diagnostic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.