ArticlePloS one2025
An obesity paradox in preterm birth: A case control study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Maternal Pregestational Body Mass Index and Delivery Outcomes: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary High-Income Setting.Journal of nutrition and metabolism · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The March of Dimes Global action report indicated that preterm birth (PTB) rates are increasing in most countries. It is the most important cause of neonatal deaths and the second leading cause of death in children under age 5. Literature reporting the relationship between maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and PTB has previously yielded inconsistent conclusions. Our objective is to fill in the knowledge gap by evaluating the interaction of socio-economic status (SES) and BMI and its relationship to the rate of PTB. This is a case control study using the Natality Data of the National Vital Statistics System from the years 2020-2022. BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915-0.931, P < 0.001). Those who were LSES also had a curved relationship with PTB indicating that the as BMI increases, the odds of PTB decreases up until a BMI value, then the PTB rate increases. This relationship was not found in higher economic status women. Our study had two significant findings. We first found an obesity paradox in PTB for those mothers who are LSES. We also found that the relationship between BMI and PTB was not linear but curvilinear, bridging the gap in the conclusions of other studies. This study fills in the knowledge gap of BMI and PTB by adding the consideration of social class and by creating a polynomial BMI term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.