ArticlePloS one2025
Characteristics of Friction Stir Welding of 3 mm thick ABS and PC thermoplastic polymers: An experimental approach.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The utilization of thermoplastics is extensively prevalent in modern industrial sectors owing to their distinctive mechanical features. Friction stir welding is recognized as a distinctive joining technology that addresses the weaknesses of heat-induced fusion welding. This friction-stirred solid-state welding technology can be effectively employed to join various difficult-to-weld polymeric materials. This paper examines the weldability of friction stir butt welding utilizing a cylindrical tapered threaded tool on a 3 mm thick Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) and Polycarbonate (PC) polymers. The impact of tool rotational speed (800 and 1200 rpm) and tool traverse speed (10 mm/min to 50 mm/min) on the joint strength of welded samples has been analyzed. The maximum joint efficiency achieved is 52.71% for ABS while using a rotational speed of 1200 RPM and a traverse speed of 10 mm/min. For PC, the maximum joint efficiency is 54% with a rotational speed of 800 RPM and a traverse speed of 40 mm/min. The joint efficiency of polymer is significantly improved as a result of the effective heat distribution and fusion during the welding. The tensile strength of ABS polymer decreases as the traverse speed increases from 10 mm/min to 50 mm/min at both rotational speeds of 800 and 1200 rpm. However, the tensile strength of PC polymer exhibits fluctuations as the traverse speed increases from 10 mm/min to 50 mm/min. This behavior may be attributed to the fluctuating heating and cooling conditions that occur during the welding process at varying rotation and traverse speeds. In contrast to the polymeric base material, the weld zone demonstrated a lower hardness value. The heated tool induces material softening, which results in a reduction in hardness. An examination of alterations in the microstructure of the weld zone was conducted using scanning electron microscopy and stereo microscopy. The observed microstructures were applied to determine the reasons for the decrease in strength. The micrographs illustrate the formation of a fragmentation, attributable to the residual stress generated during the rapid cooling of the liquid polymer. Moreover, a highly increased temperature or traverse speed may result in the formation of voids at the joint interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.