Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40338834›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2025

Adolescent cardiorespiratory fitness and risk of cancer in late adulthood: A nationwide sibling-controlled cohort study in Sweden.

Marcel Ballin, Daniel Berglind, Pontus Henriksson, Martin Neovius, Anna Nordström, Francisco B Ortega, Elina Sillanpää, Peter Nordström, Viktor H Ahlqvist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marcel BallinClinical Geriatrics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9638-7208
Daniel BerglindDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0616-7779
Pontus HenrikssonDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2482-7048
Martin NeoviusClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2300-3055
Anna NordströmRehabilitation Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3534-456X
Francisco B OrtegaDepartment of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), University of Granada; CIBEROBN, ISCIII, Granada, Andalucía, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2001-1121
Elina SillanpääFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-959X
Peter NordströmClinical Geriatrics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2924-508X
Viktor H AhlqvistClinical Geriatrics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1383-3194

Funding

LEGENNDS: Linking Epidemiology and GEnetics of Neurodevelopmental and Neurodegenerative Disorders StudyR01NS131433 · NINDS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI Brian Kane Lee · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS131433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiorespiratory fitness has been linked to both lower and higher risks of cancer, but the evidence comes from observational analysis which may be influenced by unobserved confounders and bias processes. We aimed to examine the associations between adolescent cardiorespiratory fitness and risk of cancer in late adulthood while addressing the unknown influence of unobserved familial confounders and diagnostic bias processes. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a sibling-controlled cohort study with registry linkage based on all Swedish men who participated in mandatory military conscription examinations from 1972 to 1995 and who completed standardized cardiorespiratory fitness testing. The outcomes were overall cancer diagnosis and cancer mortality, and 14 site-specific cancers (diagnosis or death), ascertained using the National Patient Register and Cause of Death Register until 31 December 2023. A total of 1,124,049 men, including 477,453 full siblings, with a mean age of 18.3 years at baseline, were followed until a median (maximum) age of 55.9 (73.5) years, during which 98,410 were diagnosed with cancer and 16,789 died from cancer (41,293 and 6,908 among full siblings respectively). In cohort analysis, individuals in the highest quartile of fitness had a lower risk of overall cancer mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67, 0.76; P < 0.001) compared to the lowest quartile, corresponding to a standardized cumulative incidence (1-Survival) difference of -0.85 (95% CI [-1.00, -0.71]) percentage points at 65 years of age. Individuals in the highest quartile of fitness also had lower risks (HRs ranging from 0.81 to 0.49, incidence differences ranging from -0.13 to -0.32 percentage points; P < 0.001 for all) of rectum, head and neck, bladder, stomach, pancreas, colon, kidney, liver, bile ducts, and gallbladder, esophagus, and lung cancer. Yet, individuals in the highest quartile of fitness had higher risks of prostate (HR: 1.10, 95% CI [1.05, 1.16]; P < 0.001, incidence difference: 0.48 percentage points, 95% CI [0.23, 0.73]) and skin cancer (e.g., non-melanoma HR: 1.44, 95% CI [1.38, 1.50]; P < 0.001, incidence difference: 1.84 percentage points, 95% CI [1.62, 2.05]). Individuals in the highest quartile of fitness had a higher risk of overall cancer diagnosis (HR: 1.08, 95% CI [1.06, 1.11]; P < 0.001, incidence difference: 1.32 percentage points, 95% CI [0.94, 1.70]), results driven by prostate and skin cancer being the most common types of cancer. When comparing full siblings, and thereby controlling for unobserved shared confounders, the lower risk of overall cancer mortality remained (HR: 0.78, 95% CI [0.68, 0.89]; P < 0.001, incidence difference: -0.61 percentage points, 95% CI [-0.93, -0.28]), while the excess risk of prostate (HR: 1.01, 95% CI [0.90, 1.13]; P = 0867, incidence difference: 0.05 percentage points, 95% CI [-0.50, 0.60]), skin (e.g., non-melanoma HR: 1.09, 95% CI [0.99, 1.20]; P = 0.097, incidence difference: 0.40 percentage points, 95% CI [-0.07, 0.87]), and overall cancer diagnosis (HR: 1.00, 95% CI [0.95, 1.06]; P = 0.921, incidence difference: 0.04 percentage points, 95% CI [-0.80, 0.88]) attenuated to the null. For other site-specific cancers, sibling comparisons results varied, with more attenuation for melanoma, kidney, stomach, bladder, pancreas, and liver, bile ducts, and gallbladder cancer, while associations with lung, colon, head and neck, and esophagus cancer seemed to attenuate less. The findings were confirmed through an extensive set of sensitivity analyses. The main limitations of this study include the lack of inclusion of female participants, lack of data on other risk factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity, and only adjustment for the unobserved confounders which are shared between full siblings.

conclusionsHigher levels of adolescent cardiorespiratory fitness were associated with lower overall cancer mortality in late adulthood, a finding that persisted in sibling comparisons. However, the influence of unobserved familial confounding appeared to vary by cancer type and be more pronounced for cancer diagnoses than for mortality. This may suggest a need for robust causal methods to triangulate results, rather than relying on correlations alone, to better inform public health efforts.

Indexed as

Cardiorespiratory FitnessNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk FactorsSiblingsSwedenYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40338834
PMCPMC12061154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.