ArticleJASA express letters2025
Temporal coherence effects on voice attribution in multi-speaker stream segregation.
Article in JASA express letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The principle of temporal coherence predicts that two temporally coherent voices should form a unified auditory stream, whereas incoherent voices should form separate streams. This prediction was tested by asking 20 normal-hearing listeners to identify the last word spoken by the higher or lower of two talkers, preceded by temporally coherent or incoherent phrases spoken by the same two talkers, or by silence. In contrast to results from stream-segregation studies using simple repeating stimuli that manipulated temporal coherence, no significant differences in performance were observed between the conditions, raising questions regarding the generalization of temporal-coherence principles to complex speech.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.