Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40338639›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2025

Continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of barriers and opportunities for care improvement.

Maria Assunta Barchiesi, Armando Calabrese, Roberta Costa, Francesca Di Pillo, Antonio D'Uffizi, Luigi Tiburzi, Erum Zahid

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Type 2 diabetes mellitus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Assunta BarchiesiDepartment of Enterprise Engineering "Mario Lucertini", University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via del Politecnico, 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Armando CalabreseDepartment of Enterprise Engineering "Mario Lucertini", University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via del Politecnico, 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Roberta CostaDepartment of Enterprise Engineering "Mario Lucertini", University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via del Politecnico, 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Francesca Di PilloDepartment of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Ariosto, 25, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Antonio D'UffiziDepartment of Enterprise Engineering "Mario Lucertini", University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via del Politecnico, 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Luigi TiburziDepartment of Enterprise Engineering "Mario Lucertini", University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via del Politecnico, 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Erum ZahidDepartment of Enterprise Engineering "Mario Lucertini", University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via del Politecnico, 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes mellitus, particularly type 2 diabetes (T2DM), is a chronic disease associated with serious complications, such as heart disease, kidney failure, and blindness. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems have emerged as a more effective alternative to traditional fingerstick testing, offering patients greater control over their condition. Despite their potential benefits, several barriers to CGM sensor use persist, limiting their widespread adoption among patients with T2DM. This review explores the barriers to CGM sensor use, particularly from the patient's perspective.

methodsA systematic literature review is conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The search focuses on studies published between January 2018 and June 2024 and is performed in two primary databases, PubMed and Scopus, selected for their relevance to T2DM research. Studies are included if they explore challenges and barriers to CGM adoption, report patient perspectives, or provide insights into the usability and accessibility of technology. The data are analyzed using deductive content analysis, applying Wilson et al.'s thematic categories as a predefined framework to systematically classify and interpret barriers to CGM adoption. This approach ensures methodological consistency and alignment with existing research on eHealth adoption challenges.

resultsThe review identifies several key barriers to CGM sensor use despite the benefits, such as improved glucose control and reduced hypoglycemic events. Major challenges include the high cost of sensors, wearability issues, discomfort from adhesive materials, and concerns about the visibility of the sensors. Additionally, patients report difficulties in interpreting the large volumes of data generated by CGM systems, as well as discomfort or fear related to sensor insertion. Lack of technological support, low health literacy, and insufficient social support are also identified as factors contributing to non-adoption.

conclusionsPolicymakers and healthcare providers are encouraged to address these barriers by developing patient-centered strategies that support the adoption of CGM sensors. Successfully overcoming these challenges can further support integrating CGM sensors with the Chronic Care Model and Automated Insulin Delivery systems. As an implication, this integration has the potential to enhance glycemic control and improve patient quality of life in the management of T2DM. Furthermore, addressing these barriers may drive advancements in sensor design, improve accessibility, and minimize the environmental impact of CGM sensor use.

Indexed as

Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Blood GlucoseContinuous Glucose MonitoringHumansQuality ImprovementTelemedicineBlood Glucosebarriers to adoptionCGM sensorspatient perspectiveself-managementtype 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)

Identifiers

PMID40338639
PMCPMC12249211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.