Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40338623›Full record

ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2025

Regional Heterogeneity in the Electromyography Activity of Extrinsic Tongue Muscles Is Critical to Tongue Function.

Christopher J Mayerl, Elska B Kaczmarek, Maressa E Kennedy, Hannah E Shideler, Ani E Smith, R Z German

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher J MayerlDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011.ORCID 0000-0003-0402-8388
Elska B KaczmarekDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011.ORCID 0000-0003-1720-7342
Maressa E KennedyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011.ORCID 0009-0009-1184-4798
Hannah E ShidelerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011.
Ani E SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011.ORCID 0009-0004-4468-9804
R Z GermanDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, 44272.ORCID 0000-0001-9989-7847

Funding

The impact of biomimetic nipple on infant feeding functionR00HD105922 · NICHD · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI MAYERL, CHRISTOPHER · 2022 to 2024
$720k
The impact of a biomimetic nipple on infant performance during breast and bottle feedingR21HD105294 · NICHD · NORTHEAST OHIO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI GERMAN, REBECCA Z · 2022 to 2023
$429k
NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD105922NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD105294NIH HHS R00HD105922NIH HHS R21HD105294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tongue, as a muscular hydrostat, performs several dynamic behaviors and functions, including feeding, vocalizing, and respiration. As such, this hydrostat must be capable of performing complex movements, which are powered via a set of muscles typically defined as "extrinsic" (originating outside of the tongue) and "intrinsic" (contained wholly in the tongue). These muscles are typically classified based on their gross anatomical positions and also are often ascribed functions based on these positions, with the extrinsic muscles being assigned the role of positioning the tongue, and the intrinsic muscles thought to function to shape it. For example, genioglossus is typically described as a tongue protruder, whereas hyoglossus is often described as a tongue retractor. However, the neural control of these muscles involves relatively small motor units, and defining the function of tongue muscles based on anatomy, when they occupy overlapping space and exhibit refined control may oversimplify their function. Yet, distinguishing between gross anatomical structures and refined neural control can be challenging due to the complexity of functions the tongue performs. Here, we used an infant animal model (pigs) to evaluate how the neural control of the tongue is modulated in anatomical space given a relatively simplified behavior (suckling). We tested for variation in control along the anteroposterior and dorsoventral axis of the tongue using high speed videofluoroscopy coupled with electromyography (EMG). We found variation in EMG firing timing along both axes, which correspond to differences in behaviors. Furthermore, this variation in activity is likely reflected by regional variation in function within a muscle. These data suggest that defining muscles by their anatomical structure over-simplifies their functional roles and that studies investigating the three-dimensional structure and function of the tongue should evaluate it based on regional variation in control, in the context of the behavior of interest.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalTongueAnimalsElectromyography

Identifiers

PMID40338623
PMCPMC12690473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.