ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Prostate cancer and metabolic syndrome: exploring shared signature genes through integrative analysis of bioinformatics and clinical data.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabolic syndrome-related gene signature for prognosis and immune microenvironment prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The incidence of both prostate cancer (PCa) and metabolic syndrome (MS) has been steadily increasing due to changes in population structure and lifestyle. These two conditions frequently co-occur, yet their shared pathogenic mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we utilized bioinformatics and machine learning techniques to analyze public datasets and validated our findings using clinical specimens from our center to identify common signature genes between PCa and MS. We began by screening differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and module genes through Linear models for microarray analysis (Limma) and Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) of four microarray datasets from the GEO database (PCa: GSE8511, GSE32571, and GSE104749; MS: GSE98895). Comprehensively bioinformatics analyses, including functional enrichment, LASSO, and random forest algorithms, coupled with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision recall curve (PRC) analyses were conducted. We identified 423 DEGs in the PCa dataset and 2481 differentially modular genes in the MS dataset. Among these, 52 intersection genes enriched in immunomodulatory pathways were found. Three common signature genes, namely GPD1L, ACY1, and C12orf75, were identified through LASSO and random forest analyses. Subsequent validation using clinical specimens confirmed differential expression of these genes in PCa, with survival analysis indicating that elevated expression of ACY1 is associated with adverse prognosis in PCa patients. Additionally, immunoinfiltration analysis revealed higher levels of macrophage M0 and activated dendritic cells in PCa tissues. In summary, our study identifies three shared signature genes between PCa and MS, with ACY1 demonstrating adverse prognostic significance in PCa. Our findings provide a foundation for elucidating the pathogenic mechanisms and interplay between PCa and MS, offering novel insights for identifying potential therapeutic targets in PCa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.