ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2025
The PLN Foundation is striving for a cure, but who owns the disease?
Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The PLN Foundation, established in 2012, supports about 1700 individuals with a phospholamban (PLN) gene mutation causing severe cardiomyopathy. It aims to cure this rare disease by collaborating with universities, research institutions, and biotechnology companies. However, the foundation often faces challenges in being recognised as an equal research partner, with legal departments and technology transfer offices (TTOs) prioritising institutional interests over the public good, leading to delays and inefficiencies. The scientific culture's 'publish or perish' mentality, patent ownership issues, and bureaucratic ethics review processes further complicate progress. To overcome these barriers, the foundation advocates IP co-ownership, patient leadership, streamlined agreements, provisional ethical approvals, improved research logistics, revised evaluation metrics for scientists, and a shift in TTO strategies towards co-creation. These measures aim to enhance collaboration, accelerate therapeutic development, and ensure the accessibility and affordability of new treatments for rare diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.