Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40338468›Full record

ReviewStress biology2025

Current impacts of elevated CO

Jiata Ugwah Ekele, Richard Webster, Fatima Perez de Heredia, Katie E Lane, Abdulmannan Fadel, Rachael C Symonds

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stress biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Metrological Characterization of Low-Cost COSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Effects of Elevated COBiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Elevated COFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiata Ugwah EkeleSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK. J.U.Ekele@2024.ljmu.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8349-5024
Richard Webster *School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.
Fatima Perez de Heredia *School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.
Katie E Lane *Department of Sports and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.
Abdulmannan Fadel *Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, P.O. Box 1555, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Rachael C Symonds *School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review synthesises current research findings and modelling approaches to explore the impact of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (eCO

Indexed as

Climate changeCrop nutrientseCO2Elevated carbon dioxideFood securityNutritionPhotosynthesisWheat

Identifiers

PMID40338468
PMCPMC12061828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.