Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40338417›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2025

Tofacitinib as a possible treatment in macrophage activation syndrome: a pilot single-center study in China.

Weilin Xie, Qingyan Liu, Yanchun Tang, Yao Li, Yue Zhang, Shuhua Wang, Lin Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Mechanism and clinical progress of JAK inhibitors in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Weilin XieDepartment of Rheumatology and Nephrology, The First Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, 410005, China.
Qingyan LiuDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Qingdao University Medical College Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yudong Road 20th, Yantai, 264000, China.
Yanchun TangDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Qingdao University Medical College Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yudong Road 20th, Yantai, 264000, China.
Yao LiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Qingdao University Medical College Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yudong Road 20th, Yantai, 264000, China.
Yue ZhangDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Qingdao University Medical College Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yudong Road 20th, Yantai, 264000, China.
Shuhua WangDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Qingdao University Medical College Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yudong Road 20th, Yantai, 264000, China.
Lin WangDepartment of Rheumatology and Nephrology, The First Hospital of Changsha, Changsha, 410005, China. sycs2006@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8570-1451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur pilot study investigated the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib (TOF) in patients with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), providing a new therapeutic option.

methodsThis was a historical comparator, single-center study. Patients enrolled in our study were screened using the 2016 Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) criteria of MAS. MAS patients deemed suitable for TOF therapy were enrolled in the experimental group. The control group included MAS patients from Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital who had received biological and/or conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/csDMARDs) treatment in a similar period. Clinical characteristics, laboratory test results, MAS treatment response rates, and glucocorticoid discontinuation rates were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Serious adverse events such as thrombosis or severe infection were recorded.

resultsA total of 36 MAS patients were included-17 in the TOF treatment group and 19 in the b/csDMARDs control group. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. After six weeks, the proportion of febrile patients was significantly lower in the TOF group compared to the control group (11.8% [2/17] vs. 47.3% [9/19], P = 0.021). Significant reductions were also observed in C-reactive protein levels at week 6 (5.9% [1/17] vs. 36.8% [7/19], P = 0.026) and ferritin levels at week 12 (100.0% [17/17] vs. 26.3% [5/19], P = 0.023). The MAS treatment response rate was significantly higher in the TOF group at weeks 2 and 6 (P = 0.029 and P = 0.023, respectively). Glucocorticoid discontinuation was more frequent in the TOF group, with a 12-week discontinuation rate of 100.0% (17/17) compared to 57.9% (11/19) in the control group (P = 0.002). No serious adverse events, including thrombosis or severe infections, were reported.

conclusionOur results suggest that TOF may be as effective as or even better than b/csDMARDs, with a quicker and higher response rate in patients with MAS without severe adverse events. Key Points •Tofacitinib may be as effective or better than b/csDMARDs in MAS. •Tofacitinib may act at a quicker and higher response rate in MAS. •Tofacitinib might be an alternative therapeutic option for patients with MAS.

Indexed as

Macrophage Activation SyndromePiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesPyrrolesAdolescentAntirheumatic AgentsChildChinaC-Reactive ProteinFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansMalePilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsC-Reactive ProteinGlucocorticoidsPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesPyrrolestofacitinibDiseases modifying anti-rheumatic drugsEfficacyMacrophage activation syndromeTofacitinib

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.