ArticleBiodegradation2025
The performance of hybrid materials for the biodegradation of dichloromethane using Pseudomonas aeruginosa, coconut shell, rice husk, and metal organic framework.
Article in Biodegradation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The industrial effluents containing volatile organic compounds manipulate the purity of the environment. Dichloromethane emerges as the toxic malodor that causes carcinogenicity, mutagenicity and teratogenicity. The aim of the present study was to find out the potency of hybrid materials for the removal of dichloromethane using raw rice husk, coconut shell, metal organic framework and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The identification of bacteria was done by biochemical methods and 16SrRNA test. The characterization of adsorbents was done using sophisticated fourier transform infrared, field emission scanning electron microscopy and x-ray diffraction technique. The particle size of adsorbents was calculated using the Scherrer equation. The analysis of the final concentration of dichloromethane in hybrid materials was done by gas chromatography-flame ionization detector. The removal percentage obtained using Pse + RRH, Pse + CSAC, Pse + MOF (UiO-66(Zr), Pse + RRH + CSAC, Pse + RRH + CSAC + MOF (UiO-66)(Zr) was 96.87%, 99.80%, 97.63%, 97.35%, 98.08%, respectively with 50 mg/L of dichloromethane concentration. On the other hand, the removal percentage obtained using Pse + RRH, Pse + CSAC, Pse + MOF (UiO-66(Zr), Pse + RRH + CSAC, Pse + RRH + CSAC + MOF (UiO-66)(Zr) was 96.5%, 99.5,% 96.5%, 97.0%, 98.09, with 200 mg/L of dichloromethane concentration. The removal percentage obtained using alone Pseudomonas aeruginosa with 50 mg/L and 200 mg/L of dichloromethane was 93.78% and 92.33% respectively. The maximum removal percentage was achieved by a hybrid material using Pseudomonas aeruginosa and coconut shell.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40338331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.