ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Myocardial Deformation and Its Relation to Ventricular Shape, Preload, and Afterload in Fetuses with Suspected Coarctation of the Aorta.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimisation of an Algorithm for Fetal Strain by CMR and its Use in Suspected Coarctation of the Aorta.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detailed characterization of myocardial deformation, ventricular shape, outflow tract size, inflow Doppler patterns, cerebroplacental circulation, and cardiac output of fetuses with suspected coarctation of the aorta (COA) and a control group to gain further insights into differences between these groups. Expectant women were prospectively recruited for assessment during the third trimester of pregnancy and a comparison of echocardiographic characteristics and fetoplacental circulation according to postnatal diagnosis of either confirmed COA (c-COA), false-positive COA (fp-COA), and a control population. There were 42 fetuses recruited with suspected COA of whom 20/42 (48%) had c-COA. Fetuses with c-COA demonstrated lower (less negative) LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) compared to controls (- 20.2% ± 4.3 vs. - 23.1% ± 2.7, p = 0.01) and a non-significant trend to lower strain in the fp-COA group (LV-GLS: - 20.7% ± 5.0, p = 0.053) compared to controls. RV-GLS was significantly reduced in the fp-COA group compared to the c-COA and control groups (fp-COA: - 19.8% ± 4.5, c-COA: - 23.1% ± 4.4, control: - 23.5% ± 3.6, p = 0.04). C-COA and fp-COA had a less spherical (narrower) LV, shorter LV, and a more spherical RV compared to controls. The arterial duct diameter was larger in c-COA compared to fp-COA and controls. When analyzed according to diagnostic group, determinants of GLS and sphericity index differed between groups. For c-COA, there was correlation between LV-GLS and RV-GLS (r = - 0.51, p = 0.021). Determinants of LV-GLS in fp-COA were distal transverse aortic arch z-score and umbilical artery PI (p = 0.026, p = 0.037 respectively). The only determinant of RV-GLS in the FP-COA was arterial duct z-score (r = - 0.51, p = 0.019). There are measurable differences in functional parameters between c-COA, fp-COA, and controls. The hemodynamic characteristics of c-COA and fp-COA merit further study and should include study of the RV and cerebroplacental evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.