Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40338297›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025

[Phage therapy in Germany-Update 2025].

Christian Willy, Felix Bröcker

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christian WillyAbteilung Unfall- & Orthopädische Chirurgie, Septisch-Rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Forschungs- und Behandlungszentrum Septische Defektwunden, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Berlin, Scharnhorststraße 13, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland. ChristianWilly@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9604-3384
Felix BröckerIdorsia (Berlin) Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Berlin, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7373-9760

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage therapy is a promising approach to combat the antibiotic resistance crisis worldwide and in Germany. However, after widespread use in Germany from the 1930s to the 1960s, the number of patients treated with phages each year dropped to under a hundred in the following decades. An overview of the current situation of phage therapy in Germany and the translational research supporting it is provided. Aspects taken into account here are phage production, phage banks, clinical phage application, and ongoing translational research projects in Germany.There is a lack of phages for clinical use. Phage therapy is only used in a limited number of patients in a few clinics as an individual treatment attempt. There are several phage banks that, due to different institutional backgrounds and guidelines, do not work in a comparable way and only exchange phage stocks in the context of scientific projects. Projects in basic and translational phage research have increased considerably in Germany. The most urgent change seems to be the expansion of phage production capacities.There is still no high-quality evidence on the clinical success of phage therapy in the medical field by means of randomized controlled clinical trials. In close consultation with the regulatory authorities, it seems sensible to urgently enable a few centers to treat patients according to the Belgian model.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsPhage TherapyForecastingGermanyHumansTranslational Research, BiomedicalGermanyPhage bankPhage productionPhage therapyResearch projects

Identifiers

PMID40338297
PMCPMC12129867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.