Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40338213›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Non-feature-specific elevated responses and feature-specific backward replay in human brain induced by visual sequence exposure.

Tao He, Xizi Gong, Qian Wang, Xinyi Zhu, Yunzhe Liu, Fang Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tao HeCenter for the Cognitive Science of Language, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-0500
Xizi GongSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6263-0774
Qian WangSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2347-8798
Xinyi ZhuSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7722-5150
Yunzhe LiuChinese Institute for Brain Research, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0836-9403
Fang FangSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7718-2354

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 5244044Humanities and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China 23YJCZH071National Natural Science Foundation of China 31930053National Natural Science Foundation of China 32400874National Natural Science Foundation of China T2421004National Science and Technology Innovation 2030 Major Project 2022ZD0204802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of cortical circuits to adapt in response to experience is a fundamental property of the brain. After exposure to a moving dot sequence, flashing a dot as a cue at the starting point of the sequence can elicit successive elevated responses even in the absence of the sequence. These cue-triggered elevated responses have been shown to play a crucial role in predicting future events in dynamic environments. However, temporal sequences we are exposed to typically contain rich feature information. It remains unknown whether the elevated responses are feature-specific and, more crucially, how the brain organizes sequence information after exposure. To address these questions, participants were exposed to a predefined sequence of four motion directions for about 30 min, followed by the presentation of the start or end motion direction of the sequence as a cue. Surprisingly, we found that cue-triggered elevated responses were not specific to any motion direction. Interestingly, motion direction information was spontaneously reactivated, and the motion sequence was backward replayed in a time-compressed manner. These effects were observed even after brief exposure. Notably, no replay events were observed when the second or third motion direction of the sequence served as a cue. Further analyses revealed that activity in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) preceded the ripple power increase in visual cortex at the onset of replay, implying a coordinated relationship between the activities in the MTL and visual cortex. Together, these findings demonstrate that visual sequence exposure induces twofold brain plasticity that may simultaneously serve for different functional purposes. The non-feature-specific elevated responses may facilitate general processing of upcoming stimuli, whereas the feature-specific backward replay may underpin passive learning of visual sequences.

Indexed as

BrainMotion PerceptionTemporal LobeVisual PerceptionAdultCuesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adulthumanmagnetic fieldneurosciencesequence exposurevisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID40338213
PMCPMC12061478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.