Trial reportJournal of vision2025
Interleaved periods of exercise do not enhance visual perceptual learning.
Trial report in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal models indicate that exercise promotes visual cortex neuroplasticity; however, results from studies that have explored this effect in humans are mixed. A potential explanation for these discrepant results is the relative timing of exercise and the task used to index neuroplasticity. We hypothesized that a close temporal pairing of exercise and training on a vision task would enhance perceptual learning (a measure of neuroplasticity) compared to a non exercise control. Thirty-two participants (mean age = 31 years; range, 20-65; SD = 11.1; 50:50 sex ratio) were randomly assigned to Exercise or Non Exercise groups. The Exercise group alternated between moderate cycling along a virtual course and training on a peripheral crowding task (5 minutes each, 1 hour total intervention), and the Non Exercise group alternated between passive viewing of the virtual cycling course and the vision task. The protocol was repeated across 5 consecutive days. Both groups exhibited reduced visual crowding after 5 days of training. However, there was no difference in perceptual learning magnitude or rate between groups. Translation of the animal exercise and visual cortex neuroplasticity results to humans may depend on a range of factors, such as baseline fitness levels and the measures used to quantify neuroplasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.