Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40338177›Full record

Trial reportJournal of vision2025

Interleaved periods of exercise do not enhance visual perceptual learning.

Ken W S Tan, Amritha Stalin, Adela S Y Park, Kristine Dalton, Benjamin Thompson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ken W S TanCentre for Eye and Vision Research Limited, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Amritha StalinCentre for Eye and Vision Research Limited, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Adela S Y ParkCentre for Eye and Vision Research Limited, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Kristine DaltonCentre for Eye and Vision Research Limited, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Benjamin ThompsonCentre for Eye and Vision Research Limited, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models indicate that exercise promotes visual cortex neuroplasticity; however, results from studies that have explored this effect in humans are mixed. A potential explanation for these discrepant results is the relative timing of exercise and the task used to index neuroplasticity. We hypothesized that a close temporal pairing of exercise and training on a vision task would enhance perceptual learning (a measure of neuroplasticity) compared to a non exercise control. Thirty-two participants (mean age = 31 years; range, 20-65; SD = 11.1; 50:50 sex ratio) were randomly assigned to Exercise or Non Exercise groups. The Exercise group alternated between moderate cycling along a virtual course and training on a peripheral crowding task (5 minutes each, 1 hour total intervention), and the Non Exercise group alternated between passive viewing of the virtual cycling course and the vision task. The protocol was repeated across 5 consecutive days. Both groups exhibited reduced visual crowding after 5 days of training. However, there was no difference in perceptual learning magnitude or rate between groups. Translation of the animal exercise and visual cortex neuroplasticity results to humans may depend on a range of factors, such as baseline fitness levels and the measures used to quantify neuroplasticity.

Indexed as

ExerciseLearningNeuronal PlasticityVisual CortexVisual PerceptionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40338177
PMCPMC12068527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.