Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40338069›Full record

ArticleFaraday discussions2025

Elucidating the mechanical properties of asymmetric membranes by direct derivation of their energetics.

Giacomo Fiorin, Lucy R Forrest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Faraday discussions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giacomo FiorinComputational Structural Biology Section, National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. giacomo.fiorin@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-8793-8645
Lucy R ForrestComputational Structural Biology Section, National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. giacomo.fiorin@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-1855-7985

Funding

Development and assessment of methods for studying membrane protein structure and functionZIANS003143 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI FORREST, LUCY · 2014 to 2025
$8.9M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS003143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The asymmetry between the two leaflets of a plasma membrane (PM) is widely accepted as an essential condition for most PM-associated biochemical processes. However, recent work has also shown that asymmetric bilayers can be significantly stiffer upon bending than symmetric ones, suggesting that the same asymmetry may hinder the ability of the PM to remodel itself. Here, we address this issue by combining all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with an enhanced sampling scheme that explicitly induces membrane deformations to quantify their free-energy cost. Examining small asymmetric POPC/DOPC bilayers, we find that a small density imbalance between the leaflets increases their bending rigidity compared to bilayers with minimal imbalance, or to symmetric bilayers of the same two lipids. This result is consistent with recently proposed theoretical models that identify differential stress as the main source of stiffening in asymmetric membranes. The first-principles approach used in this study is broadly applicable to other types of membrane, enabling further exploration of the interplay between asymmetry and curvature, or the simulation of specific biological conditions of the PM.

Indexed as

Cell MembraneLipid BilayersMolecular Dynamics SimulationPhosphatidylcholinesThermodynamics1,2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholineLipid BilayersPhosphatidylcholines

Identifiers

PMID40338069
PMCPMC12451747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.