ArticleFaraday discussions2025
Elucidating the mechanical properties of asymmetric membranes by direct derivation of their energetics.
Article in Faraday discussions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The asymmetry between the two leaflets of a plasma membrane (PM) is widely accepted as an essential condition for most PM-associated biochemical processes. However, recent work has also shown that asymmetric bilayers can be significantly stiffer upon bending than symmetric ones, suggesting that the same asymmetry may hinder the ability of the PM to remodel itself. Here, we address this issue by combining all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with an enhanced sampling scheme that explicitly induces membrane deformations to quantify their free-energy cost. Examining small asymmetric POPC/DOPC bilayers, we find that a small density imbalance between the leaflets increases their bending rigidity compared to bilayers with minimal imbalance, or to symmetric bilayers of the same two lipids. This result is consistent with recently proposed theoretical models that identify differential stress as the main source of stiffening in asymmetric membranes. The first-principles approach used in this study is broadly applicable to other types of membrane, enabling further exploration of the interplay between asymmetry and curvature, or the simulation of specific biological conditions of the PM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.