ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2025
Nonsustained Atrial Fibrillation in Ambulatory ECG Recording and Thromboembolic Events in Long term Follow-Up.
Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reply to Letter to the Editor: "Methodological Considerations in Non-Sustained Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Risk".Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Reply to Letter to the Editor: "Comments on Nonsustained Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Risk: Methodological and Interpretive Considerations".Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Methodological Considerations in Non-Sustained Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Risk.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Comments on Nonsustained Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Risk: Methodological and Interpretive Considerations.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Reply to Letter to the Editor: "Rethinking Risk Stratification in Emergency Department Patients with Nonsustained Atrial Fibrillation".Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Rethinking Risk Stratification in Emergency Department Patients with Nonsustained Atrial Fibrillation.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNonsustained atrial fibrillation (NS-AF) lasting longer than 30 seconds on ambulatory electrocardiogram(ECG) monitoring is considered a potential risk factor for future persistent or permanent AF and stroke. However, the clinical significance of NS-AF episodes shorter than 30 seconds, as detected on 24-hour Holter monitoring, remains unclear, as does their potential impact on stroke risk.
methodsA total of 6117 Holter recordings were analyzed after excluding patients with AF, valvular heart disease, and a history of thromboembolic events. A total of 133 patients with NS-AF lasting less than 30 seconds and 113 controls with no detected arrhythmias were included. Both groups were followed for a mean of 65.84 ± 6.38 months.
resultsIn 133 patients (2.17%), NS-AF episodes were detected. During follow-up, the stroke rate was significantly higher in the NS-AF group [21 (15.78%) vs. 5 (4.42%), P = .004]. After excluding 20 patients through propensity matching and adjusting for other risk factors, both NS-AF (OR = 3.930, 95% CI: 1.235-12.510, P = .021) and CHA2DS2-VA score (OR = 1.819, 95% CI: 1.204-2.748, P = .004) were identified as independent predictors of ischemic stroke. In the NS-AF group, the prevalence of stroke increased with advancing CHA2DS2-VA score. Furthermore, in the NS-AF group, a CHA2DS2-VA score ≥2 demonstrated a sensitivity of 85.7%, a specificity of 56.6%, a positive predictive value of 26.8%, and a negative predictive value of 95.5% for predicting stroke (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.65-0.86.6; P < .001).
conclusionStroke risk is increased in patients with NS-AF of less than 30 seconds detected on 24-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring with a CHA2DS2-VA score ≥2. Close follow-up should be considered for these patients to evaluate the need for anticoagulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.