ArticlePsychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025
Participants' Experience of Psychedelic Integration Groups and Processes: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.
Article in Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trip killers: Addressing a critical knowledge gap in psychedelic research.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psychedelics such as psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide, and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine are increasingly recognized for their potential therapeutic benefits in treating complex and chronic mental health conditions. Growing public interest in psychedelics may drive increased consumption outside of medically supervised clinical trials. Correspondingly, legality issues and potential risks of unregulated use underscore the need for structured aftercare support, including psychedelic integration groups, to reduce harm potential. Methods: This study utilized a cross-sectional, observational, online, anonymous survey with 65 participants who used psychedelics and attended psychedelic integration groups. Participants provided qualitative data on their experiences via open-ended questions. Employing a deliberate analytic strategy, responses were subsequently analyzed using thematic analysis to identify key patterns and themes. Results: Three primary themes and associated subthemes emerged from the data: (1) reasons for attending psychedelic integration groups, (2) utility of psychedelic integration groups, and (3) adverse factors influencing participants' experience of the group. Discussion: The study underscores the therapeutic potential of psychedelic integration groups in providing essential community support and facilitating the processing of psychedelic experiences. However, it also highlights significant challenges, such as managing group dynamics and ensuring facilitators are adequately trained. These findings suggest that while integration groups can mitigate some risks associated with psychedelic use, research is needed to optimize their structure and effectiveness. Specifically, future studies should explore the development of standardized protocols and facilitator training programs to enhance the safety and efficacy of these groups. This research is crucial to inform policy and practice, ensuring that individuals seeking integration support and aftercare following psychedelic use have access to well-designed and delivered interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.