ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Sustainable human health: practical innovations of "Holding Groups for Mutual Support" (HGMS) in active aging.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a rapidly aging global society, "sustainable human health" and "active aging" have become significant international concerns. The growing demand for high-quality older adult care, alongside resource disparities, challenges sustainable active aging strategies. As the nation with the largest older adult population, China faces the urgent need to establish a sustainable older adult care system that enhances the health and well-being of older adults. "Holding Groups for Mutual Support (HGMS)" promotes autonomous aging choices and emphasizes dignified living through "home, gathering, mutual support, and self-care," addressing key issues like resource imbalances and inadequate policies. This study utilizes a mixed-methods approach that integrates both qualitative and quantitative techniques to systematically investigate the perspectives of 17 members aged 60 to 80 from the HGMS, alongside insights from 146 key stakeholders, which include family members, government representatives, enterprises, and mass media. This research identifies stakeholder attitudes toward the HGMS model, analyzes its challenges in the current social context, and explores its potential impacts on sustainable older adult care. Findings indicate that the HGMS model improves resource sharing and environmental protection while addressing the supply-demand imbalance in traditional older adult care. However, challenges remain, including inadequate policy backing, cognitive biases, and uneven resource allocation. This study provides valuable insights for developing sustainable older adult care systems in China and globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.