Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40337720›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Non-cognitive ability and relative poverty in farmer households: an empirical study from rural China.

Bochi Sun, Han Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bochi SunSchool of Economics, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.
Han YinSchool of Statistics, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploring the cognitive aspects of pro-social behavior is crucial for improving social well-being and strengthening social identity. Specifically, in today's post-poverty alleviation era, it is vital to pay attention to how non-cognitive ability can alleviate the relative poverty of farmers and further promote the consolidation and expansion of poverty alleviation achievements from the perspective of pro-social behavior. This study incorporates non-cognitive abilities into a traditional economic model, constructing a theoretical framework to analyze their impact on the economic decision-making of farmer households. Utilizing rural sample data from the 2018 China Family Panel Studies, we employed the instrumental variable and two-stage least squares methods to empirically examine this effect. The main findings of the study are as follows. (1) The empirical test results of Hypothesis 1 indicate that an enhancement in non-cognitive abilities significantly reduces relative poverty, particularly traits such as conscientiousness and extraversion, whereas agreeableness, openness, and emotional stability show no significant impact. Notably, non-cognitive abilities have a more pronounced effect on female-headed and low-educated farmer households in Western China, thereby demonstrating inclusiveness. (2) The empirical test results of Hypothesis 2 indicate that improved non-cognitive abilities enhance the quality of economic decision-making by alleviating constraints, adjusting preferences, and enhancing expectations, thereby reducing relative poverty. To effectively mitigate relative poverty among farmer households, governments must promote and provide training for these non-cognitive abilities, thus bolstering self-development capabilities and improving economic decision-making.

Indexed as

economic decision-makingfarmer households’ relative povertynon-cognitive abilitypro-social behaviorself-development ability

Identifiers

PMID40337720
PMCPMC12055783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.