Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40337718›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Monitoring the cognitive load in competitive environments in professional women's basketball.

Joan Fuster, Lluis Capdevila, Toni Caparros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joan FusterInstitut Nacional d'Educació Física de Catalunya (INEFC), Barcelona, Spain.
Lluis CapdevilaSports Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Spain.
Toni CaparrosInstitut Nacional d'Educació Física de Catalunya (INEFC), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to describe the dynamics of training loads during specific training sessions, to determine the possible differences among the metrics of Cognitive Load (CL), External Load (EL) and Internal Load (IL) between training sessions and to assess the possible relationship between the CL, EL and IL variables to completely monitor the athletes' performance level. Ten professional female basketball players (age 26.45 ± 3.5 years) took part in this descriptive study throughout the second round of competition, completing a total of 11 competitive microcycles. The training sessions were classified according to the distance between the previous game and the next one (MD +/- X), making distinctions between MD + 2, MD-4, MD-3, MD-2 and MD-1. The following descriptive variables of the tasks were recorded: specificity, number of players, playing space, time pressure, decision-making and competitive stimulus. The analyzed variables were rate of perceived cognitive exertion (RPE Cog) and heart rate variability (HRV) for CL, total amount of high intensity actions (HI-T) and total sum of accelerations - decelerations (AD-T) for EL, and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) and summated heart rate zones (SHRZ) for IL. The load dynamics showed an increase in uncertainty throughout the microcycle, progressing from less to more specific, and a load distribution in which MD + 2 and MD-1 show the lowest values and MD-4, MD-3 and MD-2 the highest. Significant differences (

Indexed as

cognitive resourcesintegral trainingload monitoringteam sportstraining demands

Identifiers

PMID40337718
PMCPMC12055858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.