ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2024
Using intervention mapping to develop an occupational therapy informed intervention for adolescents experiencing mental health difficulties.
Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Current interventions provide limited success in managing mental health in adolescents with emerging difficulties. We describe using the Intervention Mapping framework to co-develop a novel occupational therapy theory-informed intervention for adolescents with emerging mental health difficulties, addressing the need for interventions tackling activity-related determinants. Methods: We describe a mixed-method, multiphase, sequential study design informed by the six-step Intervention Mapping framework, to develop the Activity Time Use intervention. Involving a systematic scoping review, time-use survey, qualitative focus groups and Delphi consensus process informing the construction of an intervention logic model of the problem, the logic model of change and creation of an intervention programme. Results: An eight-session intervention addresses three behavioural change outcomes: improving the balance of daily activities, improving occupational choice making abilities and improving occupational performance. The programme was positively reviewed through Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) consultation against the seven aspects of acceptability (Sekhon et al., 2017). Next steps include exploring the environmental determinants affecting implementation in different intervention delivery settings and full user acceptability. Conclusions: This study has provided a real-world example of intervention-mapping, systematically developing an occupational therapy intervention to empower adolescents to adopt healthier time-use behaviours to improve their mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.