Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40337598›Full record

ArticleReading and writing2025

Handwriting in primary school: comparing standardized tests and evaluating impact of grapho-motor parameters.

Laura Sparaci, Valentina Fantasia, Chiara Bonsignori, Cecilia Provenzale, Domenico Formica, Fabrizio Taffoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reading and writing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura SparaciInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies (ISTC), National Research Council (CNR) of Italy, Via Nomentana 56, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1199-4525
Valentina FantasiaDepartment of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Faculties of the Humanities and Theology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Chiara BonsignoriAdvanced Robotics and Human Centered Technologies -CREO Lab, University Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Cecilia ProvenzaleAdvanced Robotics and Human Centered Technologies -CREO Lab, University Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Domenico FormicaSchool of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Fabrizio TaffoniAdvanced Robotics and Human Centered Technologies -CREO Lab, University Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing number of primary school students experience difficulties with grapho-motor skills involved in handwriting, which impact both form and content of their texts. Therefore, it is important to assess and monitor handwriting skills in primary school via standardized tests and detect specific grapho-motor parameters (GMPs) which impact handwriting legibility. Multiple standardized tools are available to assess grapho-motor skills in primary school, yet little is known on between-test agreement, on impact of specific GMPs on children's overall performance and on which GMPs may be specifically hard to tackle for children that are starting to consolidate their handwriting skills. These data would be extremely relevant for clinicians, therapists and educators, who have to choose among different assessment tools as well as design tailored intervention strategies to reach adequate performance on different GMPs in cases of poor handwriting. To gain better understanding of currently available standardized tools, we compared overall performance of 39 Italian primary school children (19 second graders and 20 third graders) experiencing difficulties with handwriting on three standardized tests for grapho-motor skills assessment and explored the impact of individual GMPs on child performance. Results showed some agreement between tests considering all children in our sample, but no agreement in second grade and only limited agreement in third grade. Data also allowed highlighting significant correlations between some GMP scores and children's overall performance in our sample. Finally, children in our sample appeared to experience specific difficulties with some GMPs, such as letter joins and alignment.

Indexed as

ChildrenCursive handwritingDysgraphiaGrapho-motor parametersGrapho-motor skillsPrimary school

Identifiers

PMID40337598
PMCPMC12052790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.