ArticleCureus2025
Massive Scrotal Lymphedema in an Adolescent with Intellectual Disability: A Rare Case of Infection-Related Scrotal Enlargement Requiring Subtotal Scrotectomy.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical Intervention for Filariasis-Induced Lymphedema: A Systematic Review of Ablative and Physiological Approaches.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An uncommon disorder marked by aberrant fluid accumulation brought on by lymphatic blockage, scrotal lymphedema presents major functional, cosmetic, and hygiene problems. It can be acquired or congenital; the most often occurring causes are infection, persistent inflammation, and filariasis. This case report describes a 17-year-old male patient with intellectual disability who had severe scrotal lymphedema that gradually developed over four years, causing problems with ambulation and hygienic care. Under a clinical examination, the scrotum (40 x 15 cm) was swollen and expanded, hiding the penis but having palpable testes. Ultrasound verified without testicular involvement scrotal wall thickening. After a subtotal scrotectomy preserves the testes, penis, and spermatic cord, scrotal reconstruction was done considering the functional limitation. Chronic inflammatory alterations without filarial organisms revealed by histopathology suggested an etiology connected to infections. The patient healed postoperatively with better mobility and hygienic standards. This example emphasizes the need for early identification and surgical intervention in controlling large scrotal lymphedema to maximize functional and cosmetic results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.