ArticleCureus2025
Safety and Efficacy of Robotic Hysterectomy Using an Indigenous Robotic System: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive hysterectomy approaches, including vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic hysterectomy, offer advantages over laparotomic hysterectomy. However, vaginal hysterectomy is less feasible for patients with a large uterus, prior pelvic surgery, adnexal surgery requirements, or malignancy, making laparoscopy or robotic surgery preferable. The SSI Mantra robotic system (Sudhir Srivastava Innovations Pvt. Ltd., India) features an ergonomic open-faced console with a 32-inch 3D 4K monitor, a 23-inch 2D touch monitor for system control and DICOM applications, a head-tracking safety feature, and advanced ergonomic controls. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of robotic hysterectomy using this indigenous system. Materials and methods From February to September 2024, 15 patients underwent robotic hysterectomy at Government Medical College, Nagpur. Patients were counseled about using the SSI Mantra robotic system and surgical risks, including possible conversion to laparotomy or robotic arm injury. The procedure followed a standard robotic port approach with accessory laparoscopic ports. Multiple surgeons performed the surgeries. The primary outcome was operative time, defined from incision start to closure. Additional data collected included patient intubation time, draping time, port placement, docking time, console time, surgical end time, patient out time, and estimated blood loss (fluid volume difference between irrigation and suction). Perioperative complications, readmissions, surgeon experience impact on operative time, conversion to laparotomy, hospital stay duration, hemoglobin drop, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores, and intraoperative strategies (e.g., adhesiolysis, myomectomy) were analyzed. The weight of the excised uterus was also recorded. Results All 15 cases were successfully completed. The mean body mass index was 22.36 kg/m² (range: 19-25). The mean operative time (console use) was 169.41 minutes. Docking time improved from 25 minutes in the first case to five minutes by the 12th. The mean hospital stay was 4.5 days. The average uterine weight was 104.58 g (range: 25-250 g). Estimated blood loss averaged 129.16 mL (range: 30-400 mL). Vaginal cuff closure time was recorded in one case (20 minutes). The mean VAS pain score was 3.91. A hemoglobin drop occurred in four cases, but no postoperative blood transfusions were required. There were no conversions, major complications, or readmissions. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the indigenous robotic system provides enhanced ergonomics, seven degrees of freedom, ease of operation, and improved safety with a shorter learning curve for large uteri. Further studies are needed to assess postoperative and long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.