Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40337554›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Assessing recall bias in post-conflict food security and resilience study in south Wollo zone, Ethiopia.

Jemal Hassen Muhyie, Desalegn Yayeh Ayal, Temesgen Tilahun Teshome

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jemal Hassen MuhyieCenter for Food Security Studies, College of Development Studies, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
Desalegn Yayeh AyalCenter for Food Security Studies, College of Development Studies, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
Temesgen Tilahun TeshomeCenter for Food Security Studies, College of Development Studies, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflict undermines food security resilience by disrupting the food system while data collection is often constrained during conflict periods despite the need for longitudinal studies for decision making. In such a situation, retrospective data collection that is collected post-conflict is an option. However, recall data lack reliability due to the impact of recall bias. Therefore, statistical methods can be deployed to check reliability of retrospective data for statistical inference. This research integrated a complementary study using flashbulb memory test by including questions regarding a well-known event and assessed recall bias in food security study.•We collected retrospective data from respondents on household resilience to food insecurity of conflict affected households in South Wollo Zone, Ethiopia.•By including a set question related to a known event, conflict exposure and control variables (age, gender and education), we demonstrated how the flashbulb memory test can be used to identify potential recall bias.Conflict exposure and the control variables were not statistically significant on logistic regression for this study which assured that recall bias did not affect the food security and resilience study. We conclude that data can be collected during post-conflict and its statistical reliability can be assessed using the flashbulb memory test and through Common Method Bias (CMB) statistical tests.

Indexed as

ConflictData analysisFlashbulb memory testFlashbulb memory test for recall bias assessment in retrospective data collectionFood securityRecall biasResilience

Identifiers

PMID40337554
PMCPMC12056372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.