ArticleMethodsX2025
Assessing recall bias in post-conflict food security and resilience study in south Wollo zone, Ethiopia.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conflict undermines food security resilience by disrupting the food system while data collection is often constrained during conflict periods despite the need for longitudinal studies for decision making. In such a situation, retrospective data collection that is collected post-conflict is an option. However, recall data lack reliability due to the impact of recall bias. Therefore, statistical methods can be deployed to check reliability of retrospective data for statistical inference. This research integrated a complementary study using flashbulb memory test by including questions regarding a well-known event and assessed recall bias in food security study.•We collected retrospective data from respondents on household resilience to food insecurity of conflict affected households in South Wollo Zone, Ethiopia.•By including a set question related to a known event, conflict exposure and control variables (age, gender and education), we demonstrated how the flashbulb memory test can be used to identify potential recall bias.Conflict exposure and the control variables were not statistically significant on logistic regression for this study which assured that recall bias did not affect the food security and resilience study. We conclude that data can be collected during post-conflict and its statistical reliability can be assessed using the flashbulb memory test and through Common Method Bias (CMB) statistical tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.