ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Superior mesenteric artery syndrome following colorectal surgery: a systematic review.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Persistent Vomiting and Epigastric Pain in an Adolescent: A Case of Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome Unmasked.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Superior mesenteric artery syndrome complicated with duodenal bulb-descending ulcerative stricture: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Superior mesenteric artery syndrome (SMAS) is a rare characterized by obstruction of the third portion of the duodenum due to compression of this region between the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and aorta. Diagnosis of SMAS post-surgical procedures is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms. Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, five electronic databases were systematically searched of all case reports published on SMAS diagnosed after colorectal procedures up to October 2023. The primary search of the databases revealed a total of 70 published articles. Thirty-eight studies were included. Aim: to discuss the prevalence of SMAS post-colorectal surgery, possible causes, preventive measures and best management options. Results: Total proctocolectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis was the most commonly reported surgical procedure (41.6%) preceding the diagnosis. Onset of symptoms since the primary operation had a wide range 1 day to >10 years. With a significant relation ( Limitations: Our study was limited by a small sample size, the retrospective nature of data collection, variability in patient populations, surgical techniques, and postoperative care protocols across the included studies, and short follow-up periods. Discussion: Majority of patient with SMAS following a colorectal surgery had successful conservative management (62.9%) within the time frame of 2-4 weeks (78.5%), while most reported patients with more extended conservative period eventually resorted to surgical management. Conclusion: While conservative management is usually effective, surgical intervention should always be considered if there is no improvement within 4 weeks. Future research should focus on larger prospective studies to validate these findings and explore additional predictors of treatment success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.