ReviewACS catalysis2025
On the Hunt for Chiral Single-Atom Catalysts.
Review in ACS catalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Noble Metals Single-Atom Catalysts for Photothermal-Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Chiral heterogeneous photocatalysts for enantioselective synthesis: standing on the shoulders of organocatalysis.Chemical science · 2025Review
- Plasmon-Driven Reorientation of Interfacial Water for Wastewater Electrolysis with Light-Emitting Diode Illumination.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enantioselective transformations are crucial in various fields, including chemistry, biology, and materials science. Today, the selective production of enantiopure compounds is achieved through asymmetric homogeneous catalysis. Single-atom catalysts (SACs) are emerging as a transformative approach in chemistry, enabling the heterogenization of organometallic complexes and effectively bridging the gap between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. Despite their potential, the integration of SACs into enantioselective processes remains an underexplored area. This perspective offers a comprehensive analysis of possible strategies for the design of heterogeneous asymmetric catalysts, examining how chiral surfaces, chiral modifiers, grafted chiral complexes, and spatial confinement techniques can be effectively employed to enhance enantioselectivity. Each of these methods presents distinct advantages and challenges; for example, chiral surfaces and chiral modifiers offer potential for tailored reactivity but can suffer from limited stability and selectivity, while grafted chiral complexes provide robust platforms but may face issues related to scalability and synthesis complexity. Spatial confinement strategies show promise in enhancing catalyst efficiency but may be constrained by accessibility and reproducibility concerns. These strategies lay the groundwork for their adaptation to SACs, by providing innovative approaches to replicate the well-defined chiral environments of homogeneous catalysts while preserving the stability, reusability, and unique advantages of single-atom heterogeneous systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.