ArticleRadiology case reports2025
Urothelial carcinoma mimicking Bosniak IV cystic mass: A case report.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma is the primary malignancy of the urothelium that has varying radiographic features based on the location of the tumor. Differentiating urothelial carcinoma from renal cell carcinoma is critical as interventions and management methods differ. We present a case of urothelial carcinoma within the calyceal diverticula that was initially suspected to represent Bosniak IV cyst due to cystic renal cell carcinoma. A 71-year-old male with a history of gross hematuria and a previously identified Bosniak II renal cyst underwent further imaging, revealing a Bosniak IV cystic mass with enhancing nodules. Subsequent nephrectomy unveiled noninvasive low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma within a calyceal diverticulum. This case highlights the complexity of diagnosing urothelial carcinoma within the calyceal diverticula, emphasizing the need for a high index of suspicion. The study contributes to understanding the limitations of imaging modalities, especially in cases involving calcification or stone evaluation. The coexistence of urothelial carcinoma and calyceal diverticula is rare but crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment. Documenting cases like these is vital for recognizing urothelial carcinoma mimics and ensuring appropriate patient management. The study underscores the significance of distinguishing features of calyceal diverticula and advocates for comprehensive imaging approaches in renal cystic lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.