ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
The Acceptability of Diagnostic Tests in the United Kingdom.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: It is increasingly acknowledged that public acceptability should be considered when designing, evaluating, and implementing healthcare interventions; especially for vulnerable groups. Patients and Methods: A voluntary, self-reported, anonymous questionnaire with ethical approval and patient and public involvement was distributed online through social media over a 6-month period to explore acceptability of diagnostic tests. Results: Ninety-three individuals replied to the questionnaire, of which the majority were female (89.2%) heterosexual (92.4%) white (81.6%) and resided in England (94.6%). The most encountered diagnostic test was an X-ray (92.4%) and the least encountered test was a bone marrow biopsy with local anaesthetic (0%). A sputum sample test was the most perfectly acceptable investigation (83.8%). One percent of participants felt that the cervical smear test was perfectly acceptable With reference to hysteroscopy, 44% felt a hysteroscopy was perfectly acceptable under general anaesthesia, compared to no participants with local anaesthetic or sedation. Forty one percent of participants felt a diagnostic laparoscopy was perfectly acceptable. Conclusion: The findings from this study provide insight into the acceptability of medical tests from a patient perspective and will inform a more explorative qualitative study to ensure researchers are aiming to produce tests that are sensitive, specific and importantly acceptable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.