ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Integration of histopathological image features and multi-dimensional omics data in predicting molecular features and survival in glioblastoma.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ligand-Receptor Interaction Combined with Histopathology Improves Glioma Prognostic Model.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- AI-assisted multimodal data integration for precision oncology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Multimodal artificial intelligence and machine learning in oncology: from data integration to precision cancer care.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Multi-Omics Integration for Advancing Glioma Precision Medicine.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Review
- Liver biopsy in the modern era: from traditional techniques to artificial intelligence and multi-omics integration.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- MDL-CA: a multimodal deep learning approach with a cross attention mechanism for accurate brain cancer diagnosis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant brain tumor with complex molecular mechanisms. Histopathological images provide valuable morphological information of tumors. This study aims to evaluate the predictive potential of quantitative histopathological image features (HIF) for molecular characteristics and overall survival (OS) in GBM patients by integrating HIF with multi-omics data. Methods: We included 439 GBM patients with eligible histopathological images and corresponding genetic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). A total of 550 image features were extracted from the histopathological images. Machine learning algorithms were employed to identify molecular characteristics, with random forest (RF) models demonstrating the best predictive performance. Predictive models for OS were constructed based on HIF using RF. Additionally, we enrolled tissue microarrays of 67 patients as an external validation set. The prognostic histopathological image features (PHIF) were identified using two machine learning algorithms, and prognosis-related gene modules were discovered through WGCNA. Results: The RF-based OS prediction model achieved significant prognostic accuracy (5-year AUC = 0.829). Prognostic models were also developed using single-omics, the integration of HIF and single-omics (HIF + genomics, HIF + transcriptomics, HIF + proteomics), and all features (multi-omics). The multi-omics model achieved the best prediction performance (1-, 3- and 5-year AUCs of 0.820, 0.926 and 0.878, respectively). Conclusion: Our study indicated a certain prognostic value of HIF, and the integrated multi-omics model may enhance the prognostic prediction of GBM, offering improved accuracy and robustness for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.