Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40337276›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Integration of histopathological image features and multi-dimensional omics data in predicting molecular features and survival in glioblastoma.

Yeqian Huang, Linyan Chen, Zhiyuan Zhang, Yu Liu, Leizhen Huang, Yang Liu, Pengcheng Liu, Fengqin Song, Zhengyong Li, Zhenyu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AI-assisted multimodal data integration for precision oncology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Multi-Omics Integration for Advancing Glioma Precision Medicine.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yeqian Huang *Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Linyan Chen *Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhiyuan Zhang *West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yu LiuDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Leizhen HuangDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Pengcheng LiuDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Fengqin SongDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhengyong LiDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhenyu ZhangDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant brain tumor with complex molecular mechanisms. Histopathological images provide valuable morphological information of tumors. This study aims to evaluate the predictive potential of quantitative histopathological image features (HIF) for molecular characteristics and overall survival (OS) in GBM patients by integrating HIF with multi-omics data. Methods: We included 439 GBM patients with eligible histopathological images and corresponding genetic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). A total of 550 image features were extracted from the histopathological images. Machine learning algorithms were employed to identify molecular characteristics, with random forest (RF) models demonstrating the best predictive performance. Predictive models for OS were constructed based on HIF using RF. Additionally, we enrolled tissue microarrays of 67 patients as an external validation set. The prognostic histopathological image features (PHIF) were identified using two machine learning algorithms, and prognosis-related gene modules were discovered through WGCNA. Results: The RF-based OS prediction model achieved significant prognostic accuracy (5-year AUC = 0.829). Prognostic models were also developed using single-omics, the integration of HIF and single-omics (HIF + genomics, HIF + transcriptomics, HIF + proteomics), and all features (multi-omics). The multi-omics model achieved the best prediction performance (1-, 3- and 5-year AUCs of 0.820, 0.926 and 0.878, respectively). Conclusion: Our study indicated a certain prognostic value of HIF, and the integrated multi-omics model may enhance the prognostic prediction of GBM, offering improved accuracy and robustness for clinical application.

Indexed as

genomicsglioblastomahistopathological imageprognosisproteomicstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID40337276
PMCPMC12055811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.