ArticlePrecision radiation oncology2023
Clinical study of analgesia in brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Article in Precision radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical study of analgesia in brachytherapy for cervical cancer.Precision radiation oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated the analgesic effects in patients with cervical cancer during brachytherapy. Methods: In this prospective study, 100 patients with cervical cancer who were admitted to Chongqing University Cancer Hospital between July 2021 and April 2022 were randomly divided into an analgesia group (n = 50) and a control group (n = 50). The visual analog scale (VAS) scores at applicator placement-T1, CT-scan-T2, and removal -T3, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores before brachytherapy, short-term clinical efficacy, and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results: The VAS score of the analgesia group was significantly different at T1 (0 vs. 4.34±1.02, Conclusion: Analgesia can relieve pain, maintain physical and mental health, and improve outcomes and patient satisfaction rates for cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.