ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2025
Role of computed tomography and chest radiography in imaging of Impella heart pump and associated complications.
Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objectives of the study are to identify usefulness of chest radiography (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) for the assessment of optimal Impella positioning compared to echocardiography. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, records of 500 patients were reviewed, 95 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The distance from the carina, top of the aortic arch, and in case of CT, from the aortic valve plane to the Impella inlet port was measured. Subjects were stratified into two groups based on echocardiography: Those that did require repositioning and those that did not. Results: CT revealed greater distance from the carina to the aortic valve plane in patients requiring Impella repositioning compared to those which did not (81.6 ± 15.9 mm vs. 67 ± 13.2 mm, Conclusions: CT imaging correctly identified patients that required repositioning on echocardiography. Key CT measurements serve as crucial indicators for repositioning and there is notable agreement on measurements across CXR and CT as well as CT and echocardiography in identification of Impella high or low positioning. In addition, there is evidence of significant predictors of CT measurements from CXR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.