ArticleBJUI compass2025
Outcomes in BCG failure: Outcome from a single centre UK experience.
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes in BCG failure: Outcome from a single centre UK experience.BJUI compass · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe real-world outcomes of patients with BCG failure undergoing bladder-sparing treatments (BSTs) vs radical cystectomy in the UK. Patients and Methods: A single institution audit was conducted at a tertiary bladder cancer referral service (UCLH, London, UK). Patients with BCG failure treated between January 2017 and September 2022 were included. BSTs included endoscopic surveillance, hyperthermic mitomycin and further BCG. The primary outcome was event free survival (EFS). Complete response (CR) rate and duration of response (DoR) were investigated in patients undergoing BST. The secondary outcomes were 3- and 5-year cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 112 patients were included: 30% (34/112), 32% (36/112) and 27% (30/112) had BCG unresponsive, exposed and intolerant disease and 11% (12/112) had progressed to muscle invasive disease (MIBC).In the BCG unresponsive and exposed groups, 79% (27/34) and 72% (26/36) underwent RC, with the remaining receiving BSTs. Comparing RC vs BST in BCG unresponsive and exposed groups combined, there was a significantly poorer EFS in the BST group (p < 0.001); 35.3% (6/17) patients transitioned to second-line BST due to recurrence or intolerance and a further 50% (3/6) transitioned a third line BST. There was no significant difference in CSS or OS rates. In BCG intolerance, the EFS rate was 90% as three patients experienced high-grade recurrence and underwent RC. There were no cancer-related deaths. In MIBC group, 5/12 presented with metastatic disease and 3- and 5-year CSS rates was 66% and 0%. Conclusion: This data reports real-world practice in a UK centre. BSTs in BCG unresponsive and exposed disease are supported as an alternative to RC providing the increased risk of recurrence is accepted. Additionally, consideration of formal guidance supporting BST is needed in BCG intolerance, which appears to have an excellent outcome in a cohort managed with endoscopic surveillance. Upstaging to MIBC remains a poor prognostic factor and is key to improving survival outcomes in BCG failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.