ArticleFrontiers in allergy2025
Case Report: An unusual case of cardiac anaphylaxis in the maintenance phase of
Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Two-Year Pharmacovigilance Analysis of Adverse Drug Reactions Reported from a University Allergy Setting.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac involvement in anaphylaxis remains difficult to assess; however, histamine release during an anaphylactic reaction can induce functional and metabolic alterations in the myocardium. Mast cells, identified within myocardial fibers, perivascular tissue, and arterial structures, play a crucial role in systemic and cardiac anaphylaxis through the release of inflammatory mediators, including histamine, platelet-activating factor, cytokines, chemokines, tryptase, chymase, prostaglandins, and leukotrienes. Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the most effective strategy for preventing systemic reactions in sensitized individuals. Although VIT is generally well tolerated, severe allergic reactions can occur, particularly during the build-up phase, while they are rare in the maintenance phase. Case report: We present the case of a 57-year-old male with a history of severe systemic reactions (SSR) to Vespula stings who experienced cardiac anaphylaxis during the maintenance phase of VIT. He started VIT with a conventional up-dosing schedule, which was well-tolerated. However, during the third monthly maintenance dose, he developed an anaphylactic syncopal episode with a right bundle branch block (RBBB) on ECG. He was treated promptly with adrenaline, corticosteroids, and antihistamines, and his ECG normalized within 20 days. Conclusions: This case underscores the potential cardiac involvement in anaphylaxis during VIT maintenance and highlights the need to systematically evaluate cardiovascular manifestations during anaphylaxis episodes to optimize risk assessment and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.