Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40337162›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary human sciences2025

Visual attention to faces during attractiveness and dominance judgements.

Žaneta Pátková, Vít Třebický, Martin Kocourek, Dagmar Schwambergová, Karel Kleisner, Jan Havlíček, Jitka Třebická Fialová

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary human sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Žaneta PátkováFaculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7337-3815
Vít TřebickýFaculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1440-1772
Martin KocourekFaculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5350-4198
Dagmar SchwambergováFaculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2889-6657
Karel KleisnerFaculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3277-8365
Jan HavlíčekFaculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2374-7337
Jitka Třebická FialováFaculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2419-7461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception studies describe numerous discrete morphological facial features as important to judgements of various characteristics. Interestingly, little is known about whether people actually direct their visual attention to these features and how specific contexts or sex affect this attention. We, therefore, examined visual attention to faces in the context of intersexual (opposite-sex assessment of attractiveness) and intrasexual (same-sex assessment of dominance) selection. In total, 93 women and 33 men rated 80 high-resolution facial photographs of men and women while their gaze was recorded using eye-tracking. To explore patterns of raters' attention to faces and specific facial features, we used the number of fixations, fixation duration, and visit duration as visual attention measures. Women directed more visual attention towards the faces of potential partners (more fixations) than potential rivals, and men had longer fixation duration when assessing potential partners than rivals. Facial features that acquired the most visual attention across contexts and sexes were the eyes, nose, and mouth, but small differences between the sexes and contexts in visual attention were found for other facial regions suggested by previous perception studies, such as the chin and the cheeks indicating their importance in specific judgements.

Indexed as

attractivenesscompetitiondominanceMate choicesexual selection

Identifiers

PMID40337162
PMCPMC12056419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.