Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40337142›Full record

ArticlePlasma sources science & technology2023

Foundations of plasma standards.

Luís L Alves, Markus M Becker, Jan van Dijk, Timo Gans, David B Go, Katharina Stapelmann, Jonathan Tennyson, Miles M Turner, Mark J Kushner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plasma sources science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luís L AlvesInstituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2677-574X
Markus M BeckerLeibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology (INP), Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9324-3236
Jan van DijkDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8002-5459
Timo GansSchool of Physical Sciences and National Centre for Plasma Science and Technology, Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1362-8000
David B GoDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556-5637, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8948-1442
Katharina StapelmannDepartment of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2116-2661
Jonathan TennysonDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4994-5238
Miles M TurnerSchool of Physical Sciences and National Centre for Plasma Science and Technology, Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9713-6198
Mark J KushnerElectrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2122, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7437-8573

Funding

Development of a closed-loop control system for plasma medicineR01EB029705 · NIBIB · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI BERTHIAUME, FRANCOIS, KREBS, FRED C. · 2022 to 2025
$2.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of low-temperature plasmas (LTPs) excels by virtue of its broad intellectual diversity, interdisciplinarity and range of applications. This great diversity also challenges researchers in communicating the outcomes of their investigations, as common practices and expectations for reporting vary widely in the many disciplines that either fall under the LTP umbrella or interact closely with LTP topics. These challenges encompass comparing measurements made in different laboratories, exchanging and sharing computer models, enabling reproducibility in experiments and computations using traceable and transparent methods and data, establishing metrics for reliability, and in translating fundamental findings to practice. In this paper, we address these challenges from the perspective of LTP standards for measurements, diagnostics, computations, reporting and plasma sources. This discussion on standards, or recommended best practices, and in some cases suggestions for standards or best practices, has the goal of improving communication, reproducibility and transparency within the LTP field and fields allied with LTPs. This discussion also acknowledges that standards and best practices, either recommended or at some point enforced, are ultimately a matter of judgment. These standards and recommended practices should not limit innovation nor prevent research breakthroughs from having real-time impact. Ultimately, the goal of our research community is to advance the entire LTP field and the many applications it touches through a shared set of expectations.

Indexed as

data and reaction mechanismsopen source codesplasma diagnosticsplasma dosestandard plasma sourcesstandards and best practiceverification and validation

Identifiers

PMID40337142
PMCPMC12058226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.