Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40337121›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2024

Strategies used by Occupational Therapists to overcome return-to-work obstacles perceived by workers with common mental disorders.

Eve-Lyne Robitaille-Beaumier, Jean-Philippe Lachance, Nadine Larivière, Marc Corbière

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eve-Lyne Robitaille-BeaumierSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4832-4257
Jean-Philippe LachanceHealth and Society Institute, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Nadine LarivièreSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Marc CorbièreResearch Center of the Montreal Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Few studies have focused on identifying distinctive strategies implemented for overcoming return-to-work (RTW) barriers perceived by people with common mental disorders (CMDs), and their impact on RTW. The study aimed to document the strategies used by occupational therapists to overcome RTW obstacles identified by people with CMDs, and to explore the impact of these strategies on employees' self-efficacy. Method: Ten workers followed by three occupational therapists were recruited for this study. Based on the participants' ROSES scores, the occupational therapists identified in a logbook the dimensions to be worked on and the strategies they implemented for each dimension. Data was analyzed with the use of thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Results: Three dimensions of the ROSES were most frequently targeted by the occupational therapists: job demands, fear of relapse and difficult relation with the immediate supervisor. The main strategies used to overcome these obstacles were work-oriented and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-based interventions. Most of the participants have increased their self-efficacy for RTW after using these strategies. Eighty percent of the participants returned to work at the end of the study. Conclusion: The use of work-oriented and CBT-based interventions by occupational therapists appears to be useful in improving participants' self-efficacy and promoting their return to work.

Indexed as

common mental disordersOccupational therapy practicereturn-to-work strategiesself-efficacyvalidated toolwork barriers

Identifiers

PMID40337121
PMCPMC12033623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.