ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2022
Test-retest reliability and criterion-related validity of Shih-Hsu test of attention between people with and without schizophrenia.
Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Revision and Application of Aurora in China: Based on Successful Intelligence.Journal of Intelligence · 2022Article
- Practice Effects, Test-Retest Reliability, and Minimal Detectable Change of the Ruff 2 and 7 Selective Attention Test in Patients with Schizophrenia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The "Shih-Hsu Test of Attention" (SHTA) is an iPad-based attention assessment tool developed in recent years by occupational therapists and has acceptable criterion-related validity and high test-retest reliability in preliminary application. This research project explores the criterion-related validity and test-retest reliability of SHTA between people with and without schizophrenia. Method: The participants were 76 adults with schizophrenia aged 20-64 years, and 66 adults without diagnosed mental illness aged 20-64 years were recruited in this study on a voluntary basis. Each participant was assessed twice. The participants completed both the SHTA and Chu's Attention Test (CAT) in the first test and the SHTA after 3 weeks. Findings: Analytical results indicate that the SHTA has satisfactory test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.67) and criterion-related validity (γ = 0.29, Conclusion: Our preliminary findings show that the iPad-based attention assessment tool, SHTA, has satisfactory criterion-related validity and test-retest reliability, supporting the future application of SHTA as an attention assessment tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.